Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules.
In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our".
The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following: The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
The "growth" side of the business is the lending of monies at a similar rate that the company borrows, increasing debt in the business, and thus risk, with a return way below its weighted cost of capital (see above comment on the equity).
You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit.Firstly, after a sizeable shareholder revolt (27% of free float voted against the remuneration report) the Board has introduced what, on the face of it looks like investor protection - they will only pay bonuses based on "profits" in future.Two problems with this:1) The statement admits, de facto, that the Board has destroyed shareholder value by allowing the management to pillage the business for years, but is not seeking any repayment, despite the fact that they have ample grounds to do so; and2) There is no definition of "profit" in the announcement.That they did not insist on a definition of "profits" in the announcement would suggest that they are failing in their duties under the AIM rules.As predicted, huge bonuses despite continuing to destroy shareholder value.